- Linking Active Communities  Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > The Project > General subjects and info
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Lessons from the food crisis
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Lessons from the food crisis

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message / View First Unread Post
editor View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 22
Post Options Post Options   Quote editor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Lessons from the food crisis
    Posted: 23 Sep 2009 at 4:28pm
Small farmers in developing countries have not benefited from higher food prices, thanks in part to flawed trade and agricultural policies that have made them vulnerable and weakened their positions in markets, said international agency Oxfam in a new report released on 16 October 2008, World Food Day.

In Double Edged Prices, Oxfam says that all governments, donors and agencies must learn the lessons from the crisis. These include the importance of investing in agriculture, having trade policies that ensure food security, and designing social protection systems that protect the poorest.

Teresa Cavero, author of the report and head of research at Oxfam in Spain, said: “The trend in agriculture, as in international finance, has been towards deregulation and a reduced role for the State. This has had devastating effects and innocent lives have been blighted by exposure to market volatility. It is time the world woke up to the need for developing country governments to support their poor farmers, and the obligation of developed countries to help them to do so.”

“In countries where governments have invested in agriculture, and put policies in place to target vulnerable or marginalised groups, the impacts of food price inflation have been less severe. In contrast, where there has been unmanaged trade liberalisation, underinvestment in agriculture, and little support from government, the effects have been devastating,” she added.

The sharp rise in global food prices has pushed 119 million more people into hunger, taking the global total to 967 million. Higher food prices mean people are eating less and lower quality food, children are being taken out of school and farmers are being forced to migrate to cities to live in slums (as the case studies below show). Women are especially vulnerable because they rarely own land and have limited access to credit and other services, but they bear much of the responsibility for feeding and caring for families.

Meanwhile, some of the biggest international food companies have made windfall profits. Commodity-trader, Bunge, saw its profits in the second fiscal quarter of 2008 increase by $583 million, or quadruple, compared with the same period last year. Nestlé’s global sales grew nearly nine percent in the first half of 2008, and UK supermarket Tesco, has reported profits up 10 percent from last year. Seed company, Monsanto, reported a 26 percent increase in revenue to a record $3.6bn in the fiscal quarter that ended May 31, 2008.

“Misguided or inadequate national agricultural policies, coupled with unfair trade rules and poor economic advice, has created a situation where big traders and supermarkets are gaining from price rises, and small farmers and consumers are losing out,” said Cavero.

Oxfam has criticised the international community’s inadequate response – both in terms of money and coordination. At an emergency meeting in Rome earlier this year, $12.3 billion was pledged for the food crisis, but little more than $1 billion has been disbursed so far. This is in stark contrast with the response to the current financial crisis, where huge financial resources have been mobilised by the international community in a matter of days.

Cavero says: “It is shocking that the international community has failed to organise itself to respond adequately to this. The UN taskforce produced a good plan - the Comprehensive Framework for Action - but there is still not clear leadership to implement it. Developing countries are being bombarded with different initiatives and asked to produce multiple plans for different donors. We need to see one coordinated international response, led by the UN, which channels funds urgently to those in need, and leads on implementation of the longer-term reforms.”
 
Case studies
In Haiti, existing deep poverty has been exacerbated by food price rises and hurricanes. Five million Haitians live on less than a dollar a day and in 2007 almost half the population was undernourished. Haitians have labelled the food price crisis Clorox after a brand of chlorine tablets for water purification, which cause terrible stomach pains if swallowed – like permanent hunger.

In Malawi, government subsidies have successfully boosted production levels in many areas, resulting in consecutive surpluses at the national level (a reversal of previous shortages). However, pockets of serious food insecurity still exist and some poor households are already facing a food crisis, eating only one meal a day. In some areas, women have resorted to cooking wild beans, which are poisonous if not prepared properly. This means cooking them for hours, using scarce water and firewood.

In Cambodia, soaring food prices are impacting hard on the poor in both urban and rural areas. Even rice farmers who are supposed to benefit from the high prices are struggling to feed their family, as many of them are net food buyers. Overall, 1.7 million people are facing food insecurity. Von Siphou, 42, sells fruit at a stall in Phnom Penh. She says: "I am working as hard as I can and it is not good enough. The only thing left to do is to not eat."
 
In Honduras, which is highly dependent on imports, food consumption among the poorest families has reduced by eight percent. The most affected are urban poor, subsistence farmers, day labourers, and non-farming rural poor. Sixty percent of the rural population is affected.

In Tajikistan, an exceptionally severe winter followed by a hot spring led to large losses of livestock and crops. Locusts in the south also destroyed crops. One third of the rural population is now food insecure (at least 1.7 million people).

In Brazil, well-targeted government agricultural policies have shielded small farmers and consumers from the harshest impacts. The urban poor, among others, are however, still feeling the effects of higher prices.

For more information go to www.oxfam.org

Oxfam and its partners and allies will be launching the report in many different countries around the world, including Albania, Australia, Bangladesh, Cambodia, France, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Philippines, South Africa, Spain, Tajikistan, and Tanzania. In many cases there will be additional national activities, including campaign launches and agricultural debates and workshops. Individual countries and regions will also be producing their own analysis and reports.

Copyright

This work's Creative Commons license
Creative Commons License
More info about Creative Commons Licensing



Edited by editor - 23 Sep 2009 at 4:36pm
Back to Top
ArtWebster View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Location: Spain
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 16
Post Options Post Options   Quote ArtWebster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Dec 2009 at 7:40pm
Benefit of higher food prices is vested in only one sector of the domestic financial world - SUPERMARKETS!!!
 
Forget all the baloney that is talked about production costs and trade and agricultural policies. there is only one reason why high food prices do not benefit the farmer or the consumer - the supermarket chains have a strangle-hold on the supply lines! In Spain, fruit and vegetables are regularly destroyed or given away because the prices that supermarkets will pay for them don't cover the production and distribution costs.
 
In a recent beach dump of tonnes of produce farmers were copmplaining that they were being offered 7c- 8c per kilo for something that was being sold at €1-70 to €1-90 per kilo. Not only were they being 'insulted' by these ridiculous offers, the offers were for the total crop so that nothng could be saved to sell on at higher prices to the visiting public.
 
Supermarkets have been allowed to get to the top of the food chain, literally, and have the buying power to ensure that they make the maximum profit. They also have the advertising budgets to persuade housewives that they are providing the best value.
 
Independent retailers seldom have the buying power to compete with supermarkets nor can they afford the amount of sales-floor space to apply to bulky food products to offer any serious competition. Is there any wonder that my local supermarkets can sell potatoes at €3-50 per 3kilos while the local grower gets no visitors for his superior product at €2 per 5kilos?
 
Forget the institutionalised apologist responses and excuses - supermarkets have too much control over food prices and there seems to be enough evidence at the check outs that they are working together to ensure little competition in basic agricultural product prices.
a.k.a. The Old Coot
To argue is to share an alternative point of view.
To disagree without a valid argument is futile.
http://www.costadelsol.mylocalgazette.com
http://www.costa-classified-ads.com
Back to Top
editor View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 22
Post Options Post Options   Quote editor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Dec 2009 at 2:04pm
Hi Arthur,
 
Interesting view from the Costa del Sol!
 
Supermarkets and indeed even Hypermarkets have been around in many countries for some time now.
They have evolved from the basic need of the consumer in society to find a 'one-stop shop' for many of the day-to-day provisions.  They are successful businesses.  Clap
 
I guess the farmers have been around for some time also.  If they are anything like their opposite numbers in the UK they have also been complaining for some time now.
 
If they are all going bankrupt why is their land value soaring?  Maybe it is because of the need now to grow more crops for bio-fuels.  And so evolution continues.  Wacko 
 
It is really more important to consider the issue of whether we as a world can grow enough food and deliver it in good condition to the consumer and make a profit.
 
Much of the reality is lost within so called trading agreements - like the European Common Agricultural Policy - where a few countries with agri-culture economies are subsidised by the taxpayers.
 
Free trade sadly will never be allowed to happen when the vested interests are playing with themselves in the New Capitalist Model. Angry
 
Have a successful day - social re-engineering has been around since we all left the caves. Smile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.